Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secret Well

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Horror films of Cambodia#Themes. I've taken the liberty to refine the redirection suggestion by targeting the specific section. (non-admin closure) J947 † ^edits 03:02, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Secret Well

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the requirements of WP:NFILM, lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. Blog sites such as WordPress are not reliable or acceptable sources. Dan arndt (talk) 11:01, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Cambodia. Dan arndt (talk) 11:01, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, considering it may meet this criterion for film notability: "The film was successfully distributed domestically in a country that is not a major film producing country, and was produced by that country's equivalent of a "major film studio". Articles on such a film should assert that the film in question was notable for something more than merely having been produced, and if any document can be found to support this (Note: The article hosted by Word Press is supposedly taken from the The Phnom Penh Post). If not, redirect to Horror films of Cambodia.— MY, OH, MY! (mushy yank) — 13:09, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, there is no collaborating evidence that the blog site information was taken from The Phnom Penh Post. The other cited source, appears to be user generated without any independent editorial oversight making it a highly questionable source.in any case all the information contained on that site is that the film exists and a brief publicity statement (នៅក្នុងភូមិគ្រឹះមួយ ហាក់ដូចជាមានរឿងអាថ៌កំបាំង ធ្វើអោយគ្រប់គ្នាមានការភ័យខ្លាច ព្រៀបដូចជាមានវិញ្ញាណខ្មោច ចេញពីអណ្ដូងមកលងបន្លាច។, which is translated as "In a mansion, there seems to be a mystery that frightens everyone, like a ghost coming out of a well to haunt.") and clearly does not contribute to its notability. Dan arndt (talk) 03:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. All I can find using the Khmer spelling is [1]. Each article appears unrelated. Oaktree b (talk) 13:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:14, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider option to Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:29, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirectto Horror films of Cambodia, fails WP:NFILM for standalone article.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:42, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.